The Real Cost of Slow Decisions in Aged Care
What’s the real cost of slow decisions in aged care?
It’s not just extra paperwork. It’s staff morale dropping. It’s patients and families waiting longer than they should. It’s leaders tied up in process instead of driving reform.
These costs rarely show up on a balance sheet, but they’re felt daily. Through burnout, avoidable delays, and a system that moves slower than the people it serves.
Meanwhile, sector reform keeps advancing: the new Aged Care Act and Support at Home program are now slated to begin 1 November 2025. A hard deadline for boards and managers to tighten governance and make decision-making faster and safer.
At Hyphae, we care about one thing: helping leaders cut through the clutter so care keeps moving.
What the data says (and why it matters)
The 2023 Aged Care Provider Workforce Survey estimates 549,000 staff across residential and in-home programs. Of these, 414,000 are direct-care workers, heavily weighted toward personal care roles (≈78% personal care workers, 12% registered nurses, 5% enrolled nurses, 5% allied health). In residential aged care, headcount fell from ~278k (2020) to ~273k (2023), while employment patterns skew strongly to permanent part-time and casual/fixed-term. A mix that makes timely rostering and decisions even more critical.
On the governance side, regulators are tightening expectations. The Strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards make clinical governance a board-level responsibility and explicitly require integration with corporate governance … translation: boards must remove process bottlenecks that compromise safety, quality and timely care.
Three moves that actually unblock care
1) Cut decision bottlenecks (deliberately).
Map your top 10 recurring operational decisions (incidents, unplanned leave cover, minor equipment, care-minute allocation, respite approvals). Assign clear decision rights: who recommends, who must agree, who provides input, who decides, and who performs (RAPID). Then publish a one-page delegations of authority for managers so they can act the same day, not next month.
2) Sharpen communication with standardised huddles.
Daily or twice-weekly safety/ops huddles (10–15 minutes) with a fixed agenda (staffing risks, residents at risk, discharge/transfer plans, escalations), improve foresight and reduce delay. Reviews show huddles strengthen team communication and patient safety when they’re consistent and short.
3) Make the work visible (real-time dashboards).
Leaders move faster when the facts are in one place. A simple ops dashboard (care minutes, unfilled shifts, incident trends, open actions by owner and age) helps boards and managers act on signals, not anecdotes. Health systems are increasingly standardising operational data flows for patient-flow and decision support; bring that same discipline to aged care.
Does mentoring really help (or just sound nice?)
It helps when it’s structured. Reviews and sector guidance link mentoring to better competence, job satisfaction and retention for nursing and early-career leaders. The kicker: programs work when mentors are trained, expectations are clear, and sessions focus on real cases (not theory).
What this looks like in practice
Pair an experienced executive or senior manager with an emerging leader (e.g., program lead, service manager, quality manager) for 12–16 weeks.
Use a simple case-based template (situation → decision taken → what sped it up → what slowed it down).
Track one visible metric (e.g., time from issue raised → action confirmed, or number of decisions escalated vs resolved locally).
Close with a leadership-level “what we learned” note each month to feed back into governance and system improvement.
Governance: what boards must hold
Boards can’t outsource this. Under the strengthened Standards and clinical governance guidance, governing bodies must ensure processes that keep clinical risk visible and acted on. Not stuck in committee.
That means:
A decision-rights register linked to clinical risk.
A live escalation protocol (who calls what, by when).
Quarterly assurance that front-line decisions match delegations.
A practical 30-day playbook
Week 1: See it.
Run a one-hour workshop: list decisions that routinely wait for sign-off; timebox each step; quantify delay.
Draft your decision-rights one-pager for those decisions (R/A/P/I/D).
Week 2: Standardise it.
Launch a twice-weekly huddle (15 mins). Agenda: staffing gaps, residents at risk, open actions >7 days, today’s two decisions.
Approve a fast-track for low-risk spends (e.g., threshold-based approvals).
Week 3: Instrument it.
Stand up a bare-bones dashboard (Google Sheet is fine) with four tiles: unfilled shifts, care-minute variance, incidents awaiting action, open actions >14 days.
Set owners and due dates; review in the huddle.
Week 4: Embed and mentor.
Pair each new manager with a mentor; run case-based 30-minute sessions weekly.
Report back to the board: time-to-decision fell from X to Y; three bottlenecks removed; two risks escalated same-day.
The question every board should ask
It’s not “how efficient is our paperwork?”
It’s: “how much care is lost while we’re waiting for sign-off?”
If that question stings, you’ve found your first reform target.
Hyphae’s work in action
That’s the work we do at Hyphae: building leaders who can carry reforms past the whiteboard. 🌿
If you’re ready to move from stalled decisions to meaningful change, explore More Hyphae to see how our mentoring programs and consulting services help boards and managers cut through bottlenecks. Or, see outcomes in our Impact Report.
🌿 Want more practical strategies for healthcare and aged care leadership?
Subscribe to Groundwork, our weekly newsletter for leaders navigating reform with clarity and confidence.
References
Department of Health and Aged Care. New Aged Care Act and Support at Home commencement date (2025).
My Aged Care. Support at Home Program Overview (2025).
Department of Health and Aged Care. Strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards (2024).
Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission. Clinical Governance and Board Responsibilities Guidance (2023).
Aged Care Workforce Industry Council. Aged Care Provider Workforce Survey Report (2023).
Australian College of Health Service Management (ACHSM). The Role of Mentoring in Healthcare Leadership Development (2022).
American Nurse Journal. Mentoring: A Key Strategy for Nursing Retention and Satisfaction (2021).
BMC Health Services Research. Concept Analysis of Team Huddles in Healthcare (2022).
OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. Interdisciplinary Huddles and Patient Safety (2021).
NHS England. Operational Data Dashboards for Patient Flow and Decision Support (2022).